![]() ![]() What’s important to you? I really want to know what you think is most important for CAD data management and PLM for small customers and small deployments.Ĭhris - a few things to consider on this topic:ġ. I believe the coming releases will reveal these improvements. We are making it dramatically easier to deploy, manage and use, and more simple to learn (especially for those customers that are initially focused on CAD data management). We’re in the process of enhancing the Windchill platform to make it more accessible by small to midsize customers. There is only one platform to choose and our customers can have confidence that the platform will support their needs as their business grows. Our customers don’t have to research multiple platforms to determine which they think is best for their needs. Why install a new PLM platform, migrate data and retrain users when your needs exceed the capabilities of an entry-level application? Furthermore, PTC’s partners need only understand how to sell, deploy and support one PLM platform. Why do we believe that? Well because with a single, scalable platform, customers can begin using the minimum functionality made available and easily adopt more advanced capabilities as they grow. We believe this approach is in the best interests of our customers and partners. PTC made a strategic decision to focus on a single PLM platform that scales to support small to very large customers. This is a new role that PTC recently added so that we have a full-time advocate for small customer needs. My primary role at PTC is to represent the PLM interests of smaller customers. After all, it is the small companies of today that are growing most quickly and will become the big companies of tomorrow. We hear you and I want you to know that SMB customers are important to PTC. I would like to hear other people thoughts on this subject, and suggestions for good CAD data management without having to abandon Pro/E, Wildfire, Creo. It's not too late, but it probably will be soon. Just like Microsoft is playing catch-up to Apple & Google by introducing Windows 8, PTC needs to get serious about their small customers and introduce products that are functional and convenient for them. Unfortunatley, as these companies grow and PDM becomes more of an issue, some are feeling drawn to other CAD tools that offer more affordable CAD data management tools, and I can't blame them. I still feel it is the best CAD software on the market. Many very small companies feel drawn to CAD products like SolidWorks that are more hospitable to them (than PTC), and they will be ensconced in these other CAD products as they grow, and PTC will have lost the opportunity.Īs a mechanical engineering consultant to many small, start-up companies, I have introduced several of them to Pro/Engineer/Wildfire, and they have purchased seats. I think this is very a very poor long-term strategy for PTC, since many very small companies of today will grow into very large companies in years to come. It seems as though PTC is marginalizing their very small customers and focusing on multi-million/billion dollar companies who can afford full time CAD Administrators and full time IT staff. Is PDMLink the answer? If so, it's hard to find comprehensive information about it on the web. If they do, they are not marketing it well. It still seems that PTC still does not offer a good replacement for Intralink 3.x for very small companies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |